





Electricity Crisis and Persistent Failures

The issues at first were known for what they were regardless of what the papers say. People kept their heads above the water and could decipher the truth for themselves. But for the most part, during the last two decades (twenty plus years), probably beginning from the General Ibrahim Babangida era August 1985 until 1993, the picture became muzzled. The Babangida regime marked the beginning of an era where the corrupt and the hard working civil servant were no different in the eyes of the government. The era of rewarding hard work, accountability; and holding corrupt and inept leaders accountable for their actions ended with the Buhari regime.
The reporting style of the Nigerian Press since inception, charging Northern Leaders first with ineptitude and prejudice paid a lot. Those northern leaders in trying to prove otherwise pumped money into projects and development to the south. The massive amount for example pumped annually into Lagos, including reckless spending in efforts to reclaim land from the sea for development cost billions. This writer once saw the raw statistical figures of federal projects spending in those days and it was alarming. The style paid handsomely, so much so that the Northern part of the country when it comes to developmental projects was to a greater part neglected.
There was no denying the fact that the Gen Babangida regime first came in with an idea of appeasing the minorities and Southern Nigeria in particular. The first set of cabinet positions, for example, saw a majority of position going to Christians; and ethnic wise the North and South was reflected equally to the proportional detriment of the majority population of the North. Even after the initial cabinet reshuffle, the Babangida regime continued along the same lines.
But what marked the administration the most, and tends to be the hallmark of the Babangida era was the open way it showed everyone that it was not willing to go after corrupt government officials. The “everything goes” mentality was entrenched. It also dismantled many of the institutions that Northern Nigerians were gradually developing in order to coach their people business skills, such as the Northern Nigerian Development Company NNDC headquartered in Kaduna and the like. The honeymoon with the South did not go beyond the attempt of that administration to build a self made democratic dispensation.
The result of the Post Babangida era on the nation was blackmail, and hoodwinking of the nation. The press went haywire over the annulment of the 1993 elections, which occurred before the final results were collated and announced. In that election a Southern candidate Moshood Abiola and a Northern running mate Bashir Tofa were reportedly favored to win according to the polls. Soon thereafter, the nation witnessed many southern groups such as NADECO and other organizations actively campaigning within and outside Nigeria against the nation. The Southern press raised so much heat, even though that was not the first credible election annulled, neither was it the first time the military has deceived the nation to remain in power or else wriggle it away from civilians by force.
Very soon the Northern majority were willing to lie backwards and allow everyone to set every unconstitutional agenda it wants on the people. The majority succumbed to a very undemocratic maneuver that resulted in an invasion of a cabal of lawless wolves that have today metamorphosed into party politics in Nigeria. They want to convince the nation that they can now play clean, take care of everyone and play representative politics. They use these dichotomies of North vs. South and Muslim vs. Christian to play games with their electorate, causing irreparable loss of lives and properties. Lawlessness became the vogue and corruption became the norm.
Nigerians have to realize and learn to live with reality. Any rule or administration where the majority is under oppression, and the minorities are forcing themselves on the people through manipulations of various kinds will not augur well for the nation. There is always a limit to oppressing the majority in any nation. That is why even in a country like the United States, a nation that boasts of the most enduring democracy that has lasted beyond two centuries, have learned to respect the right of the majority at all times. And Nigeria with the North controlling two thirds in land mass, and the two other regions of South West and South East sharing a third of the land mass tells the story to any objective mind.
Despite the fact that population figures do also decide many advantageous gains in the U. S., the United States census is transparent. No one goes out of their way to manipulate the numbers. They even projected after the last census that the White majority will soon become a minority in less than two decades from today. They work objectively with the numbers they get regardless of how unpalatable it may be to the ruling class which by the way are the white majority today.
Nigerians on the other hand in a very irresponsible manner still rely only on the 1963 census, which the nation and the world do realize is the last most sensible data to gauge the nation’s population. The country has attempted many censuses after that but fraud and manipulations have been forcing its rejection. That 1963 census gave the North a majority of population, and in terms of religion Muslims a majority of 47%, Christians 35% and those who claim Traditional religion and atheists 18%
It is therefore necessary for the nation to be true to itself. Nigeria is not the only country struggling with heterogeneity, but it is one that continues to manipulate itself to destruction. Had the different demographics of the nation come together just like any other heterogeneous nation, then prioritize their developmental objectives based on realities and truth, allocate to people jobs and functions and positions based on merit and expertise and not ethnicity, the nation may not be rivaled on the continent of Africa. Both capital and human resources are there to make it a reality.
PDP has dug a deceptive hole for the nation which it labeled rotational presidency. Through it, clear and brazen manipulations are being pulled on the majority. The responsibility principally lies on the shoulders of PDP to lead the nation out of such lawless quagmire. If it does not do that to the satisfaction of the people, the majority should reject it.
As for the overrun opposition that has been crippled by the PDP through both legitimate and mostly illegitimate means, this is the time to rise up and form a righteous and formidable party that gives the nation the genuine mandate of equal opportunity for all: They need to also grow up and quell intra party issues that has weaken them. A conglomerate of different opposition parties can sit and pick the most deserving interests they share and use it to form a party that allows people to run for any office of the land, from the north or south at anytime, in any election session. The nation not only needs such a party, it also needs a strong opposition to check the overzealous one party state Nigeria is turning into.
Let the opposition come together with a formidable party that respects the constitution, and rule of law. There is no reason whatsoever, that our constitution - following in the footsteps of the US constitution tested and retested for centuries - should choose to go its own way over such an important principle for selfish reasons. Imposing a minority and unpopular government on any nation to appease anyone will never work, because it negates the core value of democracy that gives every person the same right regardless of where he comes from and who he or she is.
I do not by that mean no one from a minority group should run and be elected as President. What I am saying is that is should be open to everyone, and be based on the merits of the person running for office. Anyone from any part of the country can run for any office. If one is judged to be the best to rule by the majority, regardless of where he or she comes from north or south, he should be given the chance. No party should build that unprincipled agenda into itself. And if they do we should reject them.
We should demand right now that that
clause be fixed before the next round of elections or we will reject whatever
it is the party and its officials try to impose on us. If they refuse to do
as we say, we come out onto the streets and continue to protest until they
respect our genuine interests and demands. Of recent many nations have
peacefully asserted their will that way. In unrelenting peaceful protests on
the streets they forced governments that have even celebrated victory to lay
down the crown and follow the will of the people. In Ukraine for example,
such protests tagged “Orange Revolution” in major cities lasted from November
2004 until January 2005, forcing the government to a fresh re-run election
that resulted in the victory for the protesters. We have to rescue the nation
and fix it to serve the people and their needs.
(c) The Optimist Voice. Al rights reserved
|
