INTERNATIONAL

Debating the Economy

Hadiza Wada, DBA …July 16, 2011

Common Sense is just that: common.  With a brain, and the five senses that take in and analyze information from our environment, man is fashioned to use those senses to make close to accurate judgment most of the time, and especially those that relate to his basic survival. If you listen to the politicians and the policy makers of our times, you would think they are not using these same human faculties themselves, as they make you think you cannot think out issues accurately.   Right now many nations are experiencing historical economic, and sometimes political and social challenges as well.  The United States is not immune from some of such issues too. 

The challenges even in the US are basic because they dwell on the basic means of survival, health, food, and shelter.  A very significant percentage of Americans have lost their homes in great numbers a few years ago.  Though the housing market issue has pretty much stabilized, the means of putting food on the table, and taking care of health needs (employment), have remained a daunting problem that has defied various schemes to revive.  The people meanwhile, continue to watch their elected representatives play games with the issues. 

For the past week, and most especially throughout this week, the leading Legislators have been in meetings with the White House staff, trying to resolve their political differences in order to avoid a default in debt repayment, as well as employing key strategies to solidify and strengthen the U S Economy.

As common with politicians all over the world, the politicians in the U.S. want to confuse and make the public believe that the issues are so complex for them to use their common sense to understand.  And as long as people are not willing to exert their will in the majority in order to make sure that their lives priorities are addressed, the politicians will continue to get away with it.

In his 1989 book titled “Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies”, for example, Noam Chomsky stated “my personal feeling is that citizens of the democratic societies should undertake a course of intellectual self-defense to protect themselves from manipulations and control, and to lay the basis for more meaningful democracy.” His discussions seems to suggest that it is not that the people are necessarily unaware of what is happening, or unwilling to speak out against it, the major issue usually is the lack of access to media, i.e. avenues where they could make their opinions about issues known to a mass audience.

The impasse over government spending cut and the willingness of politicians to deal with US debt issue is just one of these times when you feel that the people could be the best group to push the issue one way or another.  Despite several weeks of negotiations, the White House and Republicans leaders have not been able to come up with any solution that could rein in government spending while increasing the nation's borrowing limit. The Democrats strategy is to work on raising new revenues in any deal that would require deep spending cuts. But as usual, “the Republicans are adamantly opposed to any tax increases, even if it is limited to closing tax loopholes for the wealthiest Americans” reports Fox news.

It is not surprising that the Republicans are once again picking issue with any strategy that would lead to making the rich paying more tax, not even that the governments implement new policies that make it hard for corporations and wealthy Americans to take advantage of the loopholes built into the tax codes to further reduce what they should pay in tax.  Supporting rich corporations as against the middle and lower class Americans has been a consistent policy of the Republican Party over the years. 

The United States understandably is a capitalist economy.  Its economy is dependent on thriving corporations providing employment.  But over the years, those corporations and their Washington lobby have managed to work in swaying legal debates and bills to exclusively serve them, mostly to the detriment of the general public.  The result is that they enjoy great leverage, continue to issue huge corporate bonus checks, while shortchanging their customers from whom they make the profit.  Even the huge and controversial bailout amount doled out to them in the billions about three years ago by both the outgoing Bush administration and incoming Obama Administration, became unpopular because of the way such governmental funds were used thereafter.

What is ironic however is the fact that the same group that has held the Obama Administration to task over his “corporate Bailout” which many ascribe to what gave birth to the “Tea Party,” would now hold their horses over an issue that seeks to make such corporations and those milking it [wealthy Americas], pay their share of tax back to the coffers of government in order to further make such funds work for the people.

The majority [middle Class and below] have consistently been on the receiving end of the global challenges, with no reprieve coming from those they entrust to represent them in decision making at the federal level. 

Rather than make the hard decisions that would greatly benefit the nation, the Republicans would rather empower Obama to raise the debt ceiling, something that they may use later against the President in his bid for a second term.   We could all remember that the first utterance of a leading Republican, Senator Mitch McConnell when the party  gained majority seats in the House last year, was the goal to remove President Obama from office during his run for a second term.

Political analysts have concluded even before the present administration was voted into power that the average American is tired of Washington politics of blame-game and deadlocks, so also the issue of campaign finance and electability determining the outcome of decisions and policies.  People are hurting and what they needed then and what they need now are results, not another tug-of-war that keeps the main issues unaddressed.

(c) The Optimist Voice.  All Rights Reserved.   

 

 

 

 

..

 

 

 

..

 

 

 .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.